An Example of an Anti-Father’s Rights, Liberal Moron!

If You Support Men’s and Father’s For Equal Parental Rights, You Have to Vote for Cara Nicole, Not Juan Mendez! Why? Because Juan Mendez, An Example of an Anti-Father’s Rights, Liberal Moron!  – Men’s Rights Group of AZ

If you think Juan Mendez is a complete fool, moron and just unfit to hold public office your not the only one!

In fact, according to the American’s for Parental Equality and men’s rights advocates, you could be right!

Many men’s and father’s rights activist have long held the opinion that Juan Mendez has single-handedly  worked against legislation to change bias family court laws. This opinion appears to be true in recent public statements Juan Mendez has made.

Juan Mendez was recently asked,

“What do you plan to do to bring equality to fathers being denied rights to their children in family court when there is no domestic violence or criminal history?”

Juan Mendez looked a little shocked by the question and even asked for it to be repeated so he could compose himself. Then, the idiot (in our opinion) spilled his feminist guts.

At least from his statements…

Mendez openly plans to keep denying father’s rights to their biological children.

A Facebook video of this moron has now reached 34 thousand views of how Mendez side-stepped the entire question while throwing a bone to his liberal-feminist allies.

Source: Juan Mendez, An Example of an Anti-Father’s Rights, Liberal Moron! – Men’s Rights Group of AZ

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• Men stage child custody protest on Jeremy Corbyn’s roof
• Father’s rights movement heads to Washington, DC
• New law requires family courts to take closer look at child custody arrangements
• Man Loses Custody Battle for Teen Girls Living with Sex Offender
• Outright abomination against rudimentary civil rights and principles of law.
• Rick Scott is a complete retard even for an elected political Hero!
• Lawyers and Politicians Actually Want You and Your Children To Suffer
• “Every parent, regardless of the relationship (or lack of one) that existed at the time the child was conceived, has a responsibility to provide financial support for their child.”
• What Are Republicans Doing About Fatherlessness?
• The Fight for Change from Around The World ~ Oct 17th 2016

Family Court Oppressed Fathers Demand Parental Equality

Fathers Demand Parental Equality at U.S. Supreme Court | Leon Koziol.Com

Here we are starting another year in the same position as last year and the year before that and the year before that. Three years now since I saw my two children and three more to go if the situation remains the same. My son Scott will be sixteen in three years time and he will instantly have the freedom to choose to find me. Which is why I keep my blog running. I have said this over and over again during the last three years, all we want is equality. Not too much to ask in 2014. A fathers right to see his children and a child’s right to see his or her father. Men are often accused of being controlling, but when a mother denies a father access to his children and a child access to his or father then that is the extreme of controlling behavior. But that seems to go unrecognised. Balanced? I don’t think so. Fair? I don’t think so. Equal? I don’t think so. Children are not tools to be used as a punishment against a father.

Here we are starting another year in the same position as last year and the year before that and the year before that. Three years now since I saw my two children and three more to go if the situation remains the same. My son Scott will be sixteen in three years time and he will instantly have the freedom to choose to find me. Which is why I keep my blog running. I have said this over and over again during the last three years, all we want is equality. Not too much to ask in 2014. A fathers right to see his children and a child’s right to see his or her father. Men are often accused of being controlling, but when a mother denies a father access to his children and a child access to his or father then that is the extreme of controlling behavior. But that seems to go unrecognised. Balanced? I don’t think so. Fair? I don’t think so. Equal? I don’t think so. Children are not tools to be used as a punishment against a father.

Here we are starting another year in the same position as last year and the year before that and the year before that. Three years now since I saw my two children and three more to go if the situation remains the same. My son Scott will be sixteen in three years time and he will instantly have the freedom to choose to find me. Which is why I keep my blog running. I have said this over and over again during the last three years, all we want is equality. Not too much to ask in 2014. A fathers right to see his children and a child’s right to see his or her father. Men are often accused of being controlling, but when a mother denies a father access to his children and a child access to his or father then that is the extreme of controlling behavior. But that seems to go unrecognised. Balanced? I don’t think so. Fair? I don’t think so. Equal? I don’t think so. Children are not tools to be used as a punishment against a father.

Exactly five years after an oppressed father protested discrimination by burning himself alive on the steps of Keene County Family Court, four victimized fathers calmly walked up the steps of the United States Supreme Court to file a writ for parental equality.

Media throughout the beltway were discussing it, news releases were confirmed everywhere, and these four made history outside the halls of our nation’s highest court. And it’s high time. Give dads their due. We sacrifice in the line of duty every day for our children.

Whether it be law enforcement in Orlando, firemen headed into the towers on 9-11, or our military in foreign wars, we are sick and tired of the abuses inflicted upon us in divorce and family courts. We are tired of returning to anything but “equal justice” as promised on the top of the Supreme Court edifice.

These four professionals, a doctor, lawyer, dentist and engineer made their case at a news conference on the eve of Fathers Day. They are Dr. Mario Jimenez, M.D., Dr. Leon Koziol, J.D., Dr. Dan Pestana, DDS and John Bautista, BSME, MBA, sacrificing their professional standings by taking up this cause. They need your help.

Yes it’s Fathers Day again with those worn out stereotypes about manning up. And that’s exactly what these professionals did from New York, California, Florida and Virginia. They asked our government to man up to its responsibilities for equal rights. Being born male does not give our courts a power to denigrate our authority as equal parents under supreme laws.

While other traditionally discriminated groups have made great strides in achieving reform, fathers continue to be remanded by our courts to lower class parent status with all the oppression which comes with it. Fathers remain 85% of all parents paying support, nearly 100% of those sent to a debtor prison for delinquencies and even shot dead in the back by a traffic cop while fleeing unarmed from a support warrant (Walter Scott).

To interfere at any time with that contact , that natural bond, that dignity, is to defrock him as a parent, diminish his very identity as a man, and likely scar his children forever.

Dignity Rights for Mrs. Doubtfire: A Place for Fathers in Custody Disputes | New York Law Journal

In the iconic movie, “Mrs. Doubtfire,” a judge confronts Daniel at a hearing following the exposure of Daniel’s identity as the daddy inside the nanny and lowers the gavel. The judge dismisses Daniel’s baleful explanation of the charade—a sincere, even desperate love for his three children—as mere additional evidence of superb acting ability. He assigns permanent custody to Miranda, orders supervised visitation, and refers Daniel for psychological counseling.

With less than perfect judgment, beset with unusual habits, perhaps even a bit eccentric, but with no dangerous or truly aberrant characteristics, Daniel is like many devoted fathers of the some 70 million American dads who are knocked senseless by the legal system when spousal strife prevents amicable resolution of custody and visitation disputes during divorce and separation proceedings. On custody, she usually wins, he usually loses, especially if the children are young. He becomes a mere visitor in his children’s lives (hence the term “visitation” rights) obligated to pay child support and often doomed to fight monumental battles with spouse and court to maintain even the slightest contact with his children. A common story in states across the nation, rarely with a happy ending.

Is a disguise, a masquerade, a Mrs. Doubtfire, the only route out of the quagmire for devoted, competent fathers? Or might there be some recourse or solace to be found in the law, some concept or theory he might grab onto? The answer is a tentative, guarded, but perhaps inevitable “yes,” a right ripening on the vine called human dignity or “dignity rights,” a right that just may elevate them to the sanctum of a protected class.

Best Interests

In New York fathers ostensibly begin on a level playing field of equal protection and due process. Under the Domestic Relations Law there is no prima facie right to custody in either parent; fathers are not automatically excluded (DRL Sec. 70[a]; Sec. 240 (1)[a]). Case law, moreover, shelters visitation with repeated emphases on the crucial role a noncustodial father can play in the development of the children (Ronald S. v. Lucille Diamond S., 45 A.D.3d 295 (2007)), and the obligation of a custodial mother to assure meaningful contact between children and him (Bibi Khan-Soleil v. Armani Rashad, 111 A.D.3d 728 (2013)).

But then there is the “best interest” test which both custody and visitation courts impose as an objective evaluation of parental qualification (DRL Secs. 70, 240; Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89 (1982); Eshbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167 (1982))—a test fathers flunk in some significant degree or another more frequently than mothers.

Parental Alienation Syndrome Isn’t in the DSM…Yet

…but It’s in Plenty of Arguments

Parental Alienation Syndrome Isn’t in the DSM Yet, but It’s in Plenty of Arguments

Coined in 1985 by psychiatrist Richard Gardner, PAS describes a set of behaviors exhibited by kids whose parents deliberately turn them against the other parent, through a variety of techniques that are at once coercive, manipulative, vindictive and sociopathic.

“It’s a violent act to a child’s mind,”

Jason Patric tells Newsweek, speaking of PAS, which he says he began investigating following his initial trial to assert his parental rights with Gus. He believes parental alienation is akin to what domestic violence was 40 years ago—a dirty secret that is harming millions but not acknowledged by many mental health professionals.

201106 Parental Alienation: When Parents Break Children's Loving Bonds from Dialogue in Growth

Crucial to a child’s well being…just as a mother.

Barbara Kay: Don’t sell fathers short: They are as crucial to a child’s well being as a mother | National Post

For a recent web edition of The Walrus magazine, editor-in-chief Jonathan Kay wrote a sympathetic (but not sycophantic) reflection on Justin Trudeau, with whom he spent considerable time in his role as editorial assistant for Trudeau’s 2014 memoir, Common Ground.

“The Trudeau I Know,” reproduced in Monday’s National Post print edition, dwells on the trials of Justin’s youth associated with his parents’ breakup, and his mother Margaret’s subsequently erratic presence in his life. Long after other issues he discussed with Justin had faded from memory, what lingered for Jon were “the stories from his childhood.”

He writes: “It’s one thing for daddy to leave. That happens all the time, sadly. But when mommy walks out, that’s something very different. We are conditioned to think of a mother’s love as the one unshakable emotional pillar of a child’s life. When that pillar folds up and walks out the front door, how do you keep that roof from collapsing?”

I suppose I should feel flattered by Jon’s reverence for mothers, since I am his mother. But I don’t. What Jon admits he has been culturally “conditioned” to believe is a myth it is long past time to retire, especially by family courts whose judges, similarly “conditioned,” skew reflexively motherward in custody battles.

I know Jon meant no disrespect to his own devoted father; he was simply channeling our “feeling” culture’s received wisdom that mothers are the indispensable parent, with fathers cast as inessential, but (with the correct attitude and behaviour) valuable aides-de-camp.

In reality, it is a well-documented truth that the often more overt emotional connection between mother and child is only one pillar holding up the solid roof over children’s healthy growth. Fathers are just as important to their children as mothers, even when they do not conform to sensitive New Man standards.

We are hosting the annual TFRM Fatherless Day Rally to spread knowledge to our state officials and the general public about issues in our family court systems. Please come show your support for presumptive 50/50 custody for two, fit loving parents. This is a free, family-friendly event. We encourage everyone to make an appearance or stay with us the entire time. We also encourage you to invite friends, family, loved ones, co-workers, etc. to attend with you. There is strength in numbers. This is our time to let our voices be heard!

Dad Deprivation Eroding Modern Society

How ‘dad deprivation’ could be eroding modern society

One of the world’s most respected campaigners on men’s issues believes “dad deprivation” is directly causing what he’s termed “the boy crisis” – and unless society urgently intervenes, we will be in danger of writing off a generation of men.

This Saturday, Warren Farrell – pioneering men’s activist, author of The Myth Of Male Power and a mentor who once coached John Lennon – will give a hugely-anticipated keynote speech at Male Psychology Conference in London.

Dad-deprived boys are less likely to display empathy, be less assertive, depressed, have nightmares, talk back and be disobedientWarren Farrell

Farrell believes modern society is being tangibly eroded by dad deprivation – through increased relationship breakdown, family courts that favour mothers, and fathers denied access to their children after a separation.

He points out that in in every one of the largest 70 developed nations, boys have fallen behind girls, and what they have in common, Farrell says, is divorce. 

“Dad-deprived boys are less likely to display empathy, be less assertive, depressed, have nightmares, talk back and be disobedient,” says Farrell, 72.

“At age nine, girls and boys commit suicide in equal numbers, but boys are twice as likely aged 14, four times more likely aged 15-19, and five times more by age 20-25. This is the time when dads drift out of their lives”.

Some of Farrell’s proposed solutions are radical, such as increasing the numbers of male teachers in schools – by state legislation if necessary.

“We need a major overhaul of education system, especially in inner cities where we know dad deprivation is higher,” he says.

“These boys have no positive male role models. That makes them vulnerable to strong, destructive alpha males like gang leaders or drug dealers.”

“These boys are also most likely to be brought up by mums, then move from a mother-centered home to a woman-centered school.

“Boys need to see males caring at every stage of their lives. So we need more male teachers, period. I’d say equal amounts at least, although, in areas where there are 70 per cent single mothers, why not have 70 per cent male teachers?

“We need to encourage men into the caring sectors, to challenge the cliché that caring work is women’s work”.

Farrell also urges dads not to willingly abandon their children, which he sees as a dereliction of duty.

“Men should not withdraw like cowards,” he says. “To an eight-year-old boy, their dad is God. Backing off or abandoning them leaves the child feeling not important. Dads must fight to be a part of their children’s lives, especially if the mother blocks that”.

Here, Farrell urges separating parents to park their own differences.

Boys need to see males caring at every stage of their lives. So we need more male teachers, period. I’d say equal amounts at least ~ Warren Farrell

“Allowing dads in helps both the boy and the mother, as the child will be easier to manage for her as sole carer,” he says. “Data shows divorced mums are five times more likely to bad mouth dads than dads do mums.

JUSTICE4CHILDREN ~ Human Rights, Justice, Civil Rights.

The BEST Parent is BOTH Parents

Keeping Parents and Children Together – Human Rights, Justice, Civil Rights

Fatherless Father’s Day ~ A fight for equal parental rights

The couple sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Aug. 12, 2011, detailing 23 adjustments they wanted for CPS. Some requests included ending bonuses paid to each CPS worker for a child … 

Last testament of a loving father abused by the family court system and alienated from his children

Originally posted on Women for Men: This August our 11-year-old son will begin the sixth grade at Chaminade Preparatory School in St. Louis, MO. It is an all boys Catholic school. Chris Mack… 

Whores of the Court

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Related articles

• Please stop the unfair punishment of good fathers.
• The mantra of the best interest of the child rings hollow
• Attention All Wide Awakes
• Father of two American children to be deported after two traffic tickets
• Last testament of a loving father abused by the family court system and alienated from his children
• Unlawfully Victimized by American “Family Court” System.
• Fatherless Father’s Day ~ A fight for equal parental rights
• Oprah Winfrey Network is looking for Dads who cannot see their Kid after divorce.
• Shoot the Messenger in Family Courts
• Professional Misunderstanding of Parental Alienation

Millions of Children

Number of Single Mother Households

Twenty Two Million Missing Children!? A University of Chicago study found that in just 26 years the number of married couples with children decreased 71%, and the percent of adults who were married decreased from 75% to 56%, which is evidence of an absolutely shocking cultural implosion.  At the same time, the number of unmarried households with no children increased 230%, the number of children in single-mother households increased 417%, and the number of children living with neither parent increased 1,440%.  Only 51% of American children, or 36.4 million of them, lived with both parents, and 18.2%, or 13 million of them, lived with a single parent, in 1998.   This left 31% of the nation’s children, or 22 million of them, living with neither parent. The US Statistical Abstract, Table 76, confirms the figures from this study by using different terms and arriving at a similar figure for children who are not living with at least one parent.  This table shows that 25.7 million children live in “two parent family groups”, and that 11.9 million live in single parent households, leaving 22.5 million children living with neither parent.  10 million of these 11.9 million children live in single-mother households where they are twenty times more likely to be fatally abused than children living with their families. Why call families “two parent family groups”?  Because as many as 13 million of these 25.7 million children now living with “two parents” are actually living with step-parents, most of them step-fathers, where they are seven times more likely than children living with families to be sexually abused. That is bad enough by itself, but where are these 22 million children if they aren’t with either parent?  It’s truly hard to imagine that they could all be with other remote relatives, in foster homes, or in the care of Child Protective Services. How did we get to this state?  How could and why did the country which was once the paragon of social stability suddenly subject 22 million children to a parentless upbringing, and another 11.6 million to the physical, emotional, financial, educational, and psychological abuse of single-mother households, and another 13 million to step-parents, without our knowing about it?   78% of the nation’s jail and prison inmates grew up in a fatherless household, even though only 15% of today’s adult population grew up fatherless.  This makes adults who grew up fatherless 20 times more likely to be imprisoned than adults who grew up with a father present.  At any one time, more than 5% of those who grew up fatherless in this country are in prison, and now almost half of the nation’s children are growing up without a father who, when they become adults, will be 20 times as likely to be imprisoned and 8 times as likely to commit murder. Do they commit more crimes?  Of the 24,926 murders in 1994, 14,660 were committed by the 30 million Americans who grew up fatherless, and only 10,304 were committed by the 170 million who grew up in father headed families. Why are they so much more likely to go to prison when the rate at which they commit crimes is only 6-8 times greater than the rate at which children of non-SMHs commit crimes?  If they were only 8 times more likely to go to prison rather than 20 times, 936,000 of the 1,560,000 inmates in prison right now who grew up fatherless wouldn’t be there. This would be only 624,000 in prison, still a huge number, but only 40% of the current figure. The recent decrease in the murder rate was due solely to a temporary decrease in the age group between 15-24 which commits the most crimes.  When that age group increases to its regular level, coupled with the increase in the percent of fatherless children becoming adults, the murder rate will begin its long term, rapid acceleration to 12 murders per 100,000 population within the next 20 years.  The additional 33.6 million fatherless children added to the already 30 million adults who grew up fatherless, will cause the murder and incarceration rates to reach unprecedented levels.  A linear projection of the known data shows that we can expect fatherlessness to cause an extra 2.8 million American citizens to be in prison and an extra 25,000 American citizens to be murdered annually.  Instead of our already record high incarceration rate of 730 per 100,000 population, it will be 1,100, and instead of the already record high murder rate of 10.5 murders per 100,000 population in 1991, it will be 12. Why are these other 936,000 adults who grew up fatherless now in prison if they aren’t committing more crimes than this? Why are these adults 2.5 times more likely to be imprisoned than they are to commit a crime? The answer is related to the source of the 22 million children now living with neither parent.  Fathers and mothers aren’t abandoning their children–government bills like CAPTA, VAWA, and thousands of other hideous programs are subverting the families of these children and placing them in harm’s way.  But where did they come from and where did they go? 1,262,000 children were born to unwed mothers in 1997, which means that 20 million children have been born to unwed mothers in the last twenty years.  Another 24 million have been subjected to the vagaries the nation’s corruptible divorce courts.   This is 44 million children who SHOULD be with either a remarried mother or father, or a single mother or father, but half of them, or 22 million, are NOT. Fathers who believe the court system is “unfair” haven’t seen one ten millionth of what is unfair.  “Unfair” doesn’t even begin to characterize putting HALF of the nation’s children who have been placed under the jurisdiction of the state in a fatherless environment, and putting another 11.6 million in an SMH where they are guaranteed to be at greater risk of abuse. Congress is not implementing a casual prescription for disaster–they are consciously implementing an intentional, well planned blueprint for the systematic destruction of our society. US Households 1972 to 1998 per University of Chicago study, reported in CNN Percent Million Change % Change number 1972 population 100% 207 1999 population 100.0% 272.0 31.4% 65.0 Children under 19 in 1972 29.2% 60.4 Children under 19 in 1999 28.9% 71.4 18.1% 11.0 Adults 1972 70.8% 146.6 Adults 1999 73.8% 200.6 36.9% 54.0 Households 1972   68.3     Households 1998   102.5     Nonfamily households 1998 30.8% 31.6     Family households 1998 69.2% 70.9     Family households with children 1998 38.7% 39.6     Married couple families 1998 53.0% 54.3     Married couples with children 1970 45.0% 93.2     Married couples with children 1998 26.0% 26.7 -71.4% -66.5 Adults married in 1972 75.0% 109.9     Adults married in 1998 56.0% 112.3 2.2% 2.4 Children with “both parents” 1972 73.0% 44.1     Children with “both parents” 1998 51.0% 36.4 -17.5% -7.7 Children with both biological parents 1998 25.5% 18.2     Unmarried households no children in 1972 15.0% 10.2     Unmarried households no children in 1998 33.0% 33.8 230.2% 23.6 Children with single parents 1972 4.7% 2.8     grew up with mother 3.7% 2.2     Children with single parents 1998 18.2% 13.0 357.4% 10.2 grew up with mother 16.2% 11.6 417.2% 9.3 grew up with father 2.0% 1.4     Children in “other” households 1972 5.5% 3.3     Children in “other” households 1998 30.8% 22.0 1440.0% 20.6 other relatives besides a parent 2.0% 1.4     CPS or foster homes “neither parent” 2.0% 1.4     Children not in families, foster homes, or CPS 26.8% 19.1 Per 1999 US Statistical Abstract Table 76 Two parent “family groups” 25.1% 25.7 Single mother households 9.6% 9.8 Single father households 2.0% 2.1 Total “family groups” with children 36.7% 37.6 Children in “family groups” at 1.3/household 68.5% 48.88 Children not in “family groups” 31.5% 22.5 Adults Raised in Fatherless Households vs Adults Raised in Father Headed Families Total Fatherless Households Father-headed Families Ratio Population over 18 (millions) 200.6 30.3 170.3 0.18 Population over 25 63.6% 173.0     raised in SMHs 3.0% 5.2     Population 18-25 7.5% 20.4     raised in SMHs 10.0% 2.0     Current adults raised in SMHs 3.6% 7.2     Current adults raised in “other households” 11.5% 23.1     In prison 2,000,000 1,560,000 440,000 3.55 Percent in prison 1.00% 5.15% 0.26% 19.94 Murders 1994 24,926 14,660 10,304 1.42 Murder rate 12.4 48.4 6.05 8 In fatherless households today 47.0% 33.6 In father headed families today 53.0% 37.8 Total   71.4 Current fatherless adults   30.3 Attrition rate over 20 years   6.057712 Still alive in 20 years   24.2 Current children become adults in 20 years 33.6 Total adults raised fatherless in 20 years   57.8 Expected number in prison   2,976,391 Expected murders committed   27,970 Total population in 2020   320 Population over 18 in 2020   236 Over 18, grew up in father headed family   178.2 In prison   460,409 Expected murders committed   10,782 Total in prison     3,436,800 Total murders     38,752 In prison at father headed family rate   609,707 Murders at father headed family rate   14,278 Additional in prison due to fatherlessness   2,827,094 Additional murders due to fatherlessness   24,474 Survey from the University of Chicago, reported in CNN.

Source: Number of Single Mother Households

Related articles

• Americans for Equal Rights for Fathers
• Hold Family Courts Accountable
• Divorced Co-Parenting Oxymoron
• Get Your Children Back From Child Protective Service and Family Court
• Public Policy Institute to look into fatherhood in Marion County through 2016 study
• Crowdfunding: Help Justice For Fathers
• What Makes a Real Man?
• Dads and Daughters
• Rick Scott is a complete retard even for an elected political Hero!
• Junk Science and the Real Parental Alienation in Family Court That Nobody Talks About

Unite With Trump to End Family Court Corruption

https://videopress.com/v/0DaFVsnB

Dr. Koziol and entire team at Leon Koziol.com attend Trump rally in Albany, New York.

Our report of court corruption and reform was hand delivered to campaign staff.

By Dr. Leon R. Koziol

Is there any one out there who will take solid steps to end the abuse of parents in America’s divorce and family courts? Among the presidential candidates we all know the answer, and that’s Donald Trump.

Numerous elections have come and gone over the past fifty years and yet here we are still warring over our children in these barbaric tribunals that enrich lawyers at the expense of our children.

How many parents can truly say they got a fair shake in these courts? While the scandals, bribes and misconduct become exposed, the corruption is only escalating. And most of it is overlooked unlike other branches of government.

It’s up to us to reform this system, to replace mandatory custody awards with a shared parenting framework, to rein in over billing lawyers who profit from needless orchestrated court battles, and take back our courts.

We must demand accountability and transparency through protests of diverse kinds. It’s a self regulated system we are fighting which is reaping havoc on all facets of our society. In a self governing nation like ours we have a duty to take action.

Yet no one in government today seems to care. That’s because it’s become a lucrative trillion dollar child control industry. Each year it’s getting worse. How many can truly say that they were treated fairly and respectfully in these courts, and if so, at what cost?

While we watch our rights evaporate, qualified advocates are censored to unconscionable levels. My ordeal is the classic example. Shockingly the suppression comes from the very people whose jobs are created to protect free speech, judges who prefer to fault us for the injury they inflame upon our children, families and communities.

In response to the latest court rulings designed to continue the censorship and suppression of this site, I have completed a report which exposes the corruption and charts a course of action. We have delivered it to the Trump team and will publicize it here soon.

We’ve had enough. It’s time for a war on court corruption. Please share this post, promote it and kindly make a donation for a most worthy cause. We also offer a court program to help parents avoid injustices in these courts.

All for one, and one for all.

Best regards,

Leon R. Koziol, J.D.

(315) 796-4000Source: Parents Must Unite With Trump to End Family Court Corruption | Leon Koziol.Com

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• Hold Family Courts Accountable
• Judicial Accountability for Court Ordered Parental Alienation
• How to Re Establish Parental Rights Custody of a Child
• Your children and future generations are counting on you to take action now!
• Should judges be held to the same standards as the rest of us when they commit misconduct?
• Democracy Starts When You Take a Stand~~> #StandupforZoraya #SayHerName
• Should judges be held to the same standards as the rest of us when they commit misconduct?
• The Campaign for Equal Parenting Starts With You.
• Unlawfully Victimized by American “Family Court” System.
• It is time to put Family Court back on the Political Agenda.

Hunger Protest ~ To be part of children’s lives.

http://www.parentalrights.us/video/hunger-protest-interview-ray-schwabstrong_50896f4c0.htmlHunger Protest – Interview Ray Schwabstrong

Posted by Children’s Rights on Friday, March 25, 2016

http://www.parentalrights.us/video/hunger-protest-interview-ray-schwabstrong_50896f4c0.html

Hunger protest at the state capital in Kansas. Ray Schwabstrong talks about how the system systematically isolated his parental rights to see and be part of his children’s lives. Ray talks about how is daughter was sexually abused while in custody of the state. To further the argument, Ray further explains the corruption within family court and social services and how the judge makes up rules as they continue a unconstitutional proceedings.

Ray is fighting for his rights with his wonderful wife on his side in protesting his parental rights to be a loving parent.

Supporting his family is what all of us brothers and sisters out should be doing. We need to put a stop to this abusive system that cares nothing more then hurting the children causing hardship for the parents and destroying our society.

Source: Hunger Protest – Interview Ray Schwabstrong